Pinnacle Mountian Property Owners Association


'
Back to the Board Meeting Minutes Index

\

BOARD MEETING---October 13, 2001


Minutes of the Pinnacle Mountain P.O.A Board Members
October 13, 2001

Members Present:
Robert Graham, Jr.
Tom Pfaffl
Ron Styles
Riley Ethington
Mae Hill
Robert Frick
James Hardin

Secretary `s Report
The meeting was called to order by Riley Ethington, President. The minutes of the last board meeting (7/14/2001) were approved with one change. The amount approved for road maintenance was $3,000 and not $2,000 as stated in the original minutes.

Road Commissioner
Ron Styles reported that little has been accomplished regarding maintenance of the steep section of the road. Two firms have been contacted but have not shown any real interest. We need to continue to work on a solution for this section of the road, and if necessary, fund an engineering firm to develop some options for us. Riley submitted a document from the North Carolina Transportation Department defining the standards for North Carolina Public roads. We agreed that we need standards for our development's roads, which meet or exceed the North Carolina standards to include such items as safety, amount and types of gravel, level of inclines and intersection of the road with private driveways. Tom Pfaffl will work with Ron to review the North Carolina standards and make suggestions for our own roads. Ron also received estimates for large concrete rocks which can range from $55-$90 to be placed in sections that might otherwise require guard rails for safety purposes. The board approved an annual liability insurance premium of $362.00 to R. Stanford Webb Agency for PinnacleParkway, Pinnacle Lane, Doubleview, and Tuck Back
Cove roads.

Maps for the development

Tom Pfaffl has obtained copies of plats for Phase I thru Phase V from the courthouse.

Web Site
Everyone needs to review the current web site and make any suggestions. In addition to our board minutes, we will also includea copy of the Covenants & Restrictions for our development, and our Phase I through Phase V plats. Robert Frick will check into establishing a secure section of our web site for association member access only. Our web site address is: http://mypeoplepc.com/members/thefricks/pinnaclemountainpropertyassociation/index.html

Newsletter
Phil Saracin has volunteered to be our editor and publisher for a quarterly association newsletter. Robert Frick has donated a newsletter publishing software package that Phil can use to prepare our newsletter. The board has approved the establishment of a quarterly association newsletter.

Lawyer
Our incorporation lawyer, Gene Mitchell, has provided the Articles of Incorporation and the by-laws for the
Association. We are now filed as a non-profit North Carolina corporation with Gene Mitchell's Spindale address listed for our place of business. The Articles of Incorporation as drafted by Gene Mitchell were approved as written. However, the pre-packaged by-laws must be tailored to meet the Pinnacle Mountain Association requirements. We have elected to restrict our by-laws to only defining our
association's membership, meeting, and board of director processes. We will have junior bodies of law called Policies and Resolutions that will be the controlling regulations that govern our association's conduct. There will be a separate board meeting at Robert Frick's house at 11:00 a.m. on November 3, 2001, to start reviewing the by-laws. We also agreed that we would not establish a special mailing address for the association. At the current time, the President will keep a copy of all official papers for the association including the Corporation Book; however, in the future these documents may be transferred to a lawyer's office, safety deposit box, or etc.

Architectural Committee
Robert Frick, James Hardin, and Mae Hill will assist Robert Graham Jr. in developing Architectural Policies. This Architectural Committee is an interim committee that will help to define the process and procedures for the approval and enforcement of architectural issues as established in our Covenants & Restrictions, Policies, or Rulings. At our next general election, new Architectural Committee members will be elected. It is important that anyone starting to build on his or her lot contact any member of the Architectural Committee.

Property Security
Riley submitted a security project proposal for the board's review.

PMPOA Project: Security
Prepared by: Riley Ethington
Date: 10/10/01

Background:
In the last several months, we have had at least three occurrences of personal property thefts on our mountain. As more homes are constructed, our mountain community becomes a bigger target for thieves. Many of our property owners live out of state, and several have expressed a desire to view the mountain via a camera from either their private home or a community camera set up on the mountain.

Proposal:

Determine the feasibility of utilizing the existing security gate to control access.
Establish a camera surveillance system that would monitor and record any activity at key points on our common property roads. Develop a communication process that would allow a camera to be accessed via our association's web site.
Action:
Riley has contacted Conner Computer Consultants located in Rutherfordton. They are developing a feasibility and cost analysis of the following requirements: Establish a communication network on the mountain that utilizes RF technology - no cables required. Surveillance cameras are of commercial grade with all weather capability. Also, they must have IR capability for low light operations. All surveillance activity must be recorded to an off-site location. Any property owner could access a camera via our web site. The view must be in a real-time video stream. Communication to the mountain network via satellite. The network would have the capability of allowing property owner's to access his or her private camera or security system via our web site. James Hardin and Riley will approach Mr. Robinson regarding the use of the access gate for our association. (Mr. Robinson, who lives in the glass house on the mountain next to us, bought and installed the access gate. Riley states that although Mr. Robinson owns the gate, he cannot lock the gate without us having access codes. Hopefully, there is a way to turn this into a win-win situation for Mr. Robinson and our association.)

Issues and Concerns
We have in the last year received eight letters or emails from property owners requesting information or expressing issues/concerns. Each letter or email was answered directly by a board member. The categories are:

Road Maintenance 2

Architectural Policies 1

Administrative 5

An important point discussed was the responsibility of each board member to respond and resolve any issue or request made by a member of our association.If the individual board member cannot resolve the issue, he or she should seek the help of other board members. The board member should document all aspects of any request.

Meeting adjourned
ll